The Staggering Financial Impact of Workplace Sickness
The financial burden of workplace sickness in the UK has reached unprecedented levels, now exceeding £100 billion annually. This alarming increase is primarily due to diminished productivity, driven by high rates of presenteeism—employees working while ill. A recent analysis by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) revealed that the cost of staff sickness surged by £30 billion from 2018 to 2023, reaching a total of £103 billion.
Table of Contents
Productivity Loss: The Main Culprit
The majority of this financial impact, approximately £25 billion, stems from reduced productivity. Employees working while sick, injured, or dealing with other health conditions are unable to perform at their best, leading to significant losses in efficiency and output. Additionally, £5 billion of the increase is attributed to a rise in the number of sick days taken by employees.
On average, workers now lose 44 days of productivity annually due to presenteeism, an increase from 35 days in 2018. Furthermore, employees take an average of 6.7 days off due to illness, compared to 3.7 days in 2018. These figures highlight a troubling trend: employees are more likely to come to work despite being unwell, exacerbating the issue.
The Culture of Presenteeism in the UK
The UK workforce is among the least likely to take sick leave compared to other OECD and European countries. This cultural tendency towards presenteeism—where employees work while sick—results in decreased productivity and a higher likelihood of mistakes. The IPPR’s findings emphasize that presenteeism not only affects individual well-being but also poses a substantial economic cost.
Dr. Jamie O’Halloran, a senior research fellow at the IPPR, pointed out that the pressure on UK workers to continue working despite being ill is detrimental to both health and productivity. He cited poor workplace culture, inadequate management, financial insecurity, and a lack of understanding of long-term health conditions among employers as key factors driving this issue.
The Need for a Paradigm Shift in Workplace Health
The IPPR report advocates for a significant shift in how businesses approach workplace health. Dr. O’Halloran emphasized the importance of creating environments that support employee health, allowing for necessary recovery time, and recognizing the economic benefits of a healthy workforce. By prioritizing employee well-being, businesses can protect their workforce, increase profits, and contribute to economic growth.
Tina Woods, founder and chief executive of Business for Health, highlighted the staggering costs associated with employee sickness, particularly the loss of productivity when employees work through their illnesses. This issue is more pronounced among marginalized ethnic groups, those in lower-quality jobs, and employees without formal qualifications. The IPPR’s research found that Black or Asian employees are twice as likely to work while sick compared to their white British counterparts.
Addressing the Health and Productivity Crisis
The IPPR Commission on Health and Prosperity’s final interim report calls on the government to take decisive action against businesses that negatively impact employee health. The report urges the implementation of policies that incentivize companies to enhance the health of their workforce, thereby fostering a healthier and more prosperous economy.
Kieron Boyle, chief executive of the Impact Investing Institute and IPPR commissioner, emphasized that businesses and investors increasingly view health as a valuable asset rather than a cost. The report serves as a blueprint for how businesses can play a crucial role in creating a healthy and prosperous society.
The Link Between Mental Health and Business Performance
Another critical aspect highlighted by the IPPR is the role of mental health in the workplace. A separate study published in the journal Plos One found that mental health training for line managers could significantly reduce lost sick days and improve overall business performance. Organizations that invest in mental wellness training for their managers experience better customer service, improved employee retention and recruitment, and reduced long-term sickness absence.
Prof. Holly Blake from the University of Nottingham, who led the study, stated that mental ill health is a significant cost to organizations due to sickness absence and lost productivity. The study demonstrated that training managers in mental health is linked to better business outcomes, making a strong business case for investing in mental health initiatives at work.
Conclusion: A Call to Action
The rising cost of workplace sickness in the UK highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive approach to employee health and well-being. By addressing the root causes of presenteeism and investing in mental health training, businesses can improve productivity, enhance employee satisfaction, and contribute to a healthier economy. It is crucial for employers and policymakers to recognize the value of a healthy workforce and take proactive steps to support employee well-being.